Table-Level Placement Rules and Adaptive Synchronization Mode

Translated
1

Note:
This topic has been translated from a Chinese forum by GPT and might contain errors.

Original topic: 表Level的Placement Rules 和 自适应同步模式

| username: netcaster1

I’m a bit confused. After enabling the adaptive synchronization mode for two centers in the same city, can I still set Placement Rules for a single table? Which one will take effect at this time? Will there be a conflict? If there is a conflict, does the adaptive mode dr-auto-sync take precedence and ignore the Placement Rule on the table?

2
| username: ddhe9527 | Original post link

I think this scenario should be avoided. When defining Placement Rules, reasonable override and index configurations should be set.

3
| username: system | Original post link

This topic will be automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. No new replies are allowed.